logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.08.09 2018고단1884
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On September 12, 2014, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million by the Gwangju District Court for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving), and on July 15, 2016, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 4 million by the same court for the same crime, etc.

[Criminal facts]

1. Violation of traffic Acts on roads, and violation of traffic Acts on roads;

A. On March 31, 2018, the Defendant driven a two-wheeled motor vehicle at approximately 2 km section from around the restaurant to around the lebane in the same city in the same city, from sunrise to around the lebane in the same city, while under the influence of alcohol 0.098%, without a bicycle driver’s license, at around 17:00, the Defendant was driving a two-wheeled motor vehicle at approximately 110 meters in the 2km section of CESRT from around the lebane in the same city.

B. On April 9, 2018, without a driver’s license for a bicycle, the Defendant driven a two-wheeled vehicle at approximately 200 meters from the front road of the village SCORT 110 meters from the front road of the Dong-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-dong-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-dong-ri-ri-ri-

2. Violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation;

A. The Defendant owned a two-wheeled automobile 110, and operated the two-wheeled automobile not covered by mandatory insurance on the road, on the date and time set forth in paragraph 1(a) and at the place set forth in paragraph 1(a) even if he was prohibited from operating the automobile on the road.

B. The Defendant owned a two-wheeled automobile with CESCOMT 110, and operated the two-wheeled automobile not covered by mandatory insurance on the road, at the date and time and place specified in Section 1-b, and at the place specified in Article 1-2, which was not covered by mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Notification of a response to a request for appraisal (2018-W-1950), and notification of the result of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. The ledger of driver's licenses of each motor vehicle;

1. Inquiry into each mandatory insurance;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, summary order, and other relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, such as each criminal history;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow