logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 장흥지원 2018.05.29 2016가합576
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff’s waste recycling business and the relocation of the place of business are companies operating concrete crushing business and electrical construction business, etc. with its place of business located in Gangnam-gun, Gangnam-gu. 2) The Plaintiff filed a civil petition from September 2005 to May 2008 on the grounds of noise, vibration, dust, etc. after entering four stables around the said place of business, the Plaintiff decided to continue the waste recycling business by opening the place of business in the Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, Gangnam-gu, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City F, G, and H (hereinafter “the first place of business”).

3) On October 28, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for development activities, etc. to change the form and quality for the purpose of creating a waste recycling site with respect to the instant site for the instant first place of business, with the head of Gangseo-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor), and the Gangwon Special Metropolitan City Gun (Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gun) granted the permission by setting the permission period from January 2014 to September 30, 2014; 4) thereafter, the Plaintiff was extended the permission period by September 30, 2018 through the extension of the permission period for five times. After obtaining the approval for the completion of development activities on December 6, 2017, the Plaintiff operated the waste recycling business site at the instant first place of business.

B. I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “I”)’s waste recycling business and new establishment 1) Plaintiff’s affiliate company is a company that runs a waste recycling business with its place of business in the Jeonbuk-gun J of the Jeonbuk-gun, Jeonnam-gun, and three lots of land (F and H in the site of the first place of business in this case); hereinafter “the site of the second place of business in this case”).

(B) Along with the foregoing A-2, paragraph (3) of the same Article, the period of permission for the instant site for the instant site for the instant site for the second place of business was granted from the Gangwon-do head on January 1, 2014 to September 30, 2014.

3) After that, on August 29, 2014, I applied for the change of development activities and the establishment of a factory in part of the site in the second place of business of the instant case, but received the disposition of non-approval.

arrow