1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 3, 2014, the Plaintiff, which was established on April 3, 2014 and is engaged in automobile scrapping business in B (hereinafter “instant site”); on December 1, 2016, the Plaintiff submitted a business plan containing waste disposal business plans (hereinafter “instant business plan”) to the Defendant for a comprehensive waste recycling business involving waste synthetic resin and waste wood in the instant project site.

B. On December 27, 2016, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff that the instant project plan was improper for the following reasons (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

Under the purport of contributing to the increase of income through a policy to encourage recycling of national wastes, a business plan was formulated to collect and transport waste lumbers, such as waste furnitures, waste trees, waste ships, etc., and waste synthetic resins such as waste cables, etc., and to supply fuel, etc. from the relevant workplace. However, the relevant workplace is located within the building site of the YY YY B-gun, and has no restrictions on recycling facilities as a planned control area for a special-purpose area, but a civil petition is frequently filed due to traffic caused by scattering dust, noise, frequent transfer of vehicles, and frequent traffic due to danger exposure, and stress and awareness of damage caused by exposure to a large-scale workplace, etc. - In particular, the elderly’s sanatorium is located in a nearby (150 meters), and there is 30 households in a village, and there is no concern that the residents of the relevant workplace are suffering from mental suffering, such as dust, etc., and there is a concern that the residents of the relevant workplace are suffering from mental suffering.