logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2013.03.19 2012고단1430
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【2012 Highest 1430】

1. Around 19:50 on April 21, 2012, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective injury with a deadly weapon, etc.) was under drinking alcohol in the trade name “D” located in a brea-si Ma, namely, “D,” and was punished for trial on the ground that F, who took the part of the victim E (the age of 49), was frighten in the Defendant’s daily behaviors, and the victim E and the victim H (the age of 56) took part in fighting and took part in F, and caused two beer diseases in the table. The Defendant took two beer’s faces with each other, and broken the beer’s face with each other, followed the victims of the beer’s disease, and took part of the treatment days for which the victim cannot be known, such as the number of days of harm and injury to the victim, and the number of days for which the victim H cannot be known.

【2012 Highest 1980】

2. On November 25, 2012, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a collective action, deadly weapons, etc.) cited the transition (21cc in total length, 9cc in knife) that is a deadly weapon purchased at the J convenience point located in Mapo-si I as a knife hand on November 25, 2012, and threatened the victim K (V, 49 years of age) with a deadly weapon, such as holding the Defendant’s floor hand over three to four times, and making the knife end go against the Defendant’s hand on three or four occasions.

3. The Defendant interfered with the business by force, at the time and place as set forth in the above paragraph 2, obstructed the victim K’s convenience store service by avoiding the disturbance between about 10 minutes and leaving the customers in the above convenience store out of the above method.

Summary of Evidence

[Fact of Paragraph (1) at the market] (Article 2012-type 9319)

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The second police interrogation protocol against the defendant

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of H;

1. Photographs (each fact listed in paragraphs 2 and 3 at the time of printing) (Article 2012-type 17526 at the District Public Prosecutor's Office of Mineju District Public Prosecutor's Office);

1. The defendant;

arrow