logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.04.19 2017고단6225
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 29, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on July 7, 2017 for a crime of violating the Punishment of Tax Offenses Act in order to obtain a fixed sentence on October 10.

On November 20, 2012, the defendant is the representative director of the corporation B established for the purpose of selling apartment units.

On May 21, 2016, the Defendant recruited the victims D from the sale office in the Daegu Northern-gu Seoul Northern-gu (State) B to perform the construction work of new apartment units in the fourth 359 households in the fourth 5,736 site located in the Daegu Northern-gu E-gu.

There is no problem in obtaining approval for the project due to the completion of the purchase of the project site, and construction shall be conducted in the G.S.

F apartment is a final and conclusive sale price that does not have any additional share in low-priced quantity, and if a street project that has not been established by an association is no longer distributed, it will guarantee full refund of the amount paid.

First of all, KRW 10 million and KRW 9.9 million shall be deposited in total amount of KRW 19.9 million under the pretext of business promotion expenses.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, at the time, only KRW 165 million was paid as down payment in 47 billion of the site for the business at the time, and there was no capacity or intention to implement apartment sale business as it depends on the results of the recruitment of partners in the future, and there was no capacity or intention to select the contractor and approve the business of the association. At the time, there was no capacity or intention to return the money that was paid to the victim even if the sale business was performed by receiving the money equivalent to KRW 500 million from the damaged party to the company B operated by the Defendant, rather than the trust company, with the personal debt repayment, etc.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 19.9 million from the H bank account (Account Number: I) of the Company B, and received a total of KRW 248,60,000 from the 14 victims, as shown in the List of Crimes in the attached Table.

In this respect, the defendant deceivings victims to take property.

arrow