Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won, a fine of 700,000 won, and a fine of 2,00,000 won, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

【2015 Height350 【E” is a person who installs 7 rooms and beds, etc. and operates “G” on the third floor of the F building in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Busan-si, the third floor of which is about 50 square meters. H is an employee who instructs customers at the above establishment, and Defendant A and B works as a marina branch at the above establishment.

1. Defendant A, from November 22, 2014 to November 25, 2014, had sexual intercourses with the male descendants of two to three on a daily average with the condition that he/she would receive KRW 60,000 per customer from E, on condition that he/she would receive KRW 60,000 per customer.

2. Defendant B: (a) from November 21, 2014 to November 25, 2014, the Defendant engaged in sexual intercourses with 1-2 male descendants average to 60,000 won per customer, on condition that Defendant E receive 60,000 won per customer from Defendant E.

[Defendant C] around November 18, 2014, the Defendant received 50,000 won per hour from customers I for profit without obtaining the qualification certification of a massage club in the trade name “G in the third floor of the building in Goyang-dong-gu, Goyang-si” and received 50,000 won per hour from customers I for profit.

Summary of Evidence

[Judgment of the court below]

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Cradic 【2015 Height375】

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of I’s written confirmation;

1. A and B of the relevant criminal facts; Defendant A and B of the option of a fine: Article 21(1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic; Defendant C of the option of a fine: Articles 88 and 82(1) of the Medical Service Act; Selection of a fine;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; the content of the crime in this case; the fact that there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime in the case of Defendant B and A (in the case of Defendant A, once the suspension of indictment is imposed); the same criminal records of the above Defendant in the case of Defendant C (one time fine around 2002); the gap between the time when the discovery was discovered; the family relationship and health status of the above Defendant; and