logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.07.23 2019나2036613
손해배상(기) 등
Text

1. The judgment of the first instance court, including any claims added and reduced by this court, shall be modified as follows:

Reasons

The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is as follows: (a) the part of “1. Basic Facts” from the last 3rd to 8th 5th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth son eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth e

[Supplementary or supplementary parts] Attached Forms 1 through 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be subject to the annexed Forms 1 through 3 of this judgment.

Though the first instance and the second instance trial appraiser W (hereinafter referred to as the “appraisal”) judged the defect of the “sprink water leakage” as the defect of the section for exclusive use (see, e.g., the inquiry result of Jan. 31, 2020). However, Article 6-2 subparag. 2 of the “Standards for Inspection of Defect in Multi-Family Housing, Calculation of Repair Cost and Determination of Defect”, which is the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport’s notification, regards the sprinklerr installed in the section for exclusive use as the defect of the section for common use, and the Plaintiff also claims this part of the defect as the defect of the section for common use, and the Defendants did not dispute the defect.

The 6th page of the judgment of the first instance court, the 'general mark of repair expense' is added to the following marks.

It is the cost of repairing the leakage of piping pipes that are examined below after the pre-use inspection prior to the total inspection of the divided defect repair cost.

The Defendant joining the Defendant asserts that the sum of the defects in items 2, 10, 12, 21, 23, 52, 67, 71, 73, 79, 83, 83, 92, 99, 127, 214, 239, 240, and the sum of the defects in items 2, 9, 13, and 16, 79, and 466, of the aggregate of the defects in items 2, 10, 12, 21, 23, 52, 67, 73, 79, 466, and 76,79, and 4666, for convenience, shall be considered as design defect even in accordance with the appraiser’s appraisal result (as of November 19, 2018).

The 1st year following the 2nd year following the 3th year following the 1st year following the 10th year following the 2nd year following the 3th year following the 10th year following the 2nd year 2nd year 2,960,766,951 32,293,786,742,656 41,433,354 159,857,033164,785, 2673,793, 2355,951,079 645,819,9684,125,623,361, 57,328,974 290,369,481, 49, 071, 4629, 130,4064, 3864, 259

arrow