The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s imprisonment (two years of imprisonment, confiscation, and delivery) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant that the judgment defendant led to the confession and reflect of the crime of this case, and that some of the damaged goods were temporarily returned to the victims and partly recovered from the damage.

However, in full view of all the sentencing conditions, including the circumstances leading to the instant crime, Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the instant crime, such as the fact that the period of the instant crime was repeated during the period of repeated crime, the total amount of damage was long, the number of crimes was considerable, and the victims did not agree with the lower court to the extent that there was no change in circumstances that led to the instant crime, and thus, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.