The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s imprisonment (three years of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The Defendant habitually intruded another person’s residence on 19 occasions and stolen property to be stolen.

In determining the punishment against the defendant, the court below considered that the defendant prepared the criminal implements and sirens, invaded upon the residence, the attitude of the crime is dangerous, the amount of damage is large, the defendant was punished five times as a result of the same crime, and recidivism was committed only once again, and part of the damage was temporarily returned.

As a result of the examination of evidence, even though considering the fact that the amount of damage recovered is up to half of the total amount of damage as the defendant's assertion, the sentencing of the court below is too unreasonable.

The defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.