logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.07.24 2019가합100060
청구이의
Text

1. Compulsory execution based on the payment order in the loan case against the defendant against the plaintiff by the Daejeon District Court 2016 tea6890.

Reasons

8. 8. 16. 4,00,00,00 on July 29, 2016; 4,00,00,000 on August 16, 2016; 70,000 on July 30, 2016; 26,00 on August 30, 200, 11, 200 on July 30, 200, 200 on July 30, 200, 200 on June 30, 200, 200 on June 30, 200, 200 on August 16, 200, 200, 200 on August 10, 2016, 200 on August 24, 2016;

B. On September 11, 2016, the Plaintiff drafted to the Defendant a certificate of borrowing the following content (hereinafter “the instant certificate of borrowing”).

I will pay the KRW 10 million by November 25, 2016.

* The creditors of the special agreement may take other legal measures against the guarantor and debtor before the due date for payment when it is necessary to secure the claim against the guarantor and debtor as the source of securing the claim.

The obligor and the surety note that they will not raise any civil or criminal issues with respect to the foregoing special terms and conditions. * Easia (C. 3.5 million won), Easia7 (D. 2 million won), Easia8 (E. 3.5 million won), Easia5 (G. 3 million won), BMW 520d (H. 2 million won) * The Plaintiff, E as joint and several sureties:

C. On October 19, 2016, the Defendant issued an order to pay the Plaintiff KRW 123 million (the sum of remittances No. 1, 2,8, 9, 10, 20, and 29; hereinafter “instant loan”) and the amount of the agreed amount based on the instant loan certificate (hereinafter “instant agreed amount”) KRW 170,000,000,000. On October 26, 2016, the Defendant issued an order to pay the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 293,00,000 in total of the above loan and agreed amount, and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum as stipulated in the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the day following the delivery of the original copy of the payment order to the day of full payment.”

The Daejeon District Court No. 2016 tea6890 (hereinafter “instant payment order”). This case’s payment order.

arrow