logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원영동지원 2020.12.03 2020고단90
컴퓨터등사용사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"200 Highest 90"

1. On December 23, 2019, the Defendant, by using computers, etc., made a false statement to the victim B, as if he were to return the “I will use a cell phone temporarily” at the PC room located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon.

However, after receiving the victim's mobile phone, the Defendant obtained property benefits equivalent to 110,000 won by inputting the victim's mobile phone chip out of the said PC building into the victim's mobile phone and inserting the victim's mobile phone into the Defendant's mobile phone, and by inputting the victim's mobile phone number and the certification number sent out from the victim's mobile phone number without authority in the D settlement book, and by making the victim impose the price on the victim.

In addition, the Defendant, at the same date and at the same place, twice each of KRW 110,00,11,000, inputs the victim’s mobile phone number, authentication number, etc. at the mobile phone purchase settlement center without authority, and obtained property benefits equivalent to KRW 242,00,000 in total, by inserting the victim’s mobile phone number, authentication number, etc. at the same method.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired property benefits by inputting information without authority into a computer or any other information processing device.

2. On December 24, 2019, the defrauded concluded that “Around December 24, 2019, the Defendant borrowed KRW 200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 from the Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu E hotel to the victim B.”

However, there was no fact that the defendant was employed in the bank, and there was no intention or ability to pay the above money to the victim.

The Defendant, as such, deceiving the victim, and taking the victim’s cell phone from the victim’s cell phone, was used by the post office smart banking scams to use it, at the post office account in the name of the victim.

arrow