The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (4 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below recognizes the crime of this case and reflects the fact that the defendant does not want the punishment of the defendant, but the amount of the fraud of this case is not small. The defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he was sentenced to the suspended sentence for six months on November 26, 2014 by fraud in Suwon District Court Sejong District Court, which became final and conclusive on July 26, 2014. The defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the suspended sentence even though he was sentenced to the suspended sentence due to fraud, etc., and the defendant was absent on the date of the suspended sentence. After he was notified of the date of the first trial and was absent on the date of the suspended sentence for the purpose of delaying the suspended sentence, the defendant did not intentionally receive a writ of summons for the purpose of delaying the suspended sentence, such as repeating the submission of a written correction of address within one to two days after the crime, and other circumstances such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, motive, means and result after the crime, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.