All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (two years of imprisonment and confiscation) declared by the court below is too heavy or too unhued (the defendant).

2. The Defendant and the prosecutor’s assertion of unfair sentencing, together with the grounds for sentencing, appears to have been appropriately determined by fully considering all the circumstances, including various grounds for sentencing asserted by the Defendant and the prosecutor, and there is no change in the conditions of sentencing that may change the punishment compared to the lower court. In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, the circumstances of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant and prosecutor's argument are without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[However, according to Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, "X" in paragraph (3) of the judgment of the court below as "S" among the facts constituting the crime of 2020 highestest 2170, and in the application of the law, "the use of forged official documents" in Articles 229, 225, and 30 of the Criminal Code is "the use of forged official documents" in Articles 229, 225, and 30 of the Criminal Code, "the use of falsified official documents" in Articles 234, 231, and 30 of the Criminal Code, "the use of falsified official documents" in Articles 234, 231, and 30 of the Criminal Code, "the use of falsified official documents" is corrected as "the use of falsified documents, the use of falsified documents, the use of falsified documents," and "the use of falsified official documents" in each of the above Articles 234, 231, and 30 of the Criminal Code.

.