A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Obstruction of business;

A. On May 5, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 18:34 on May 5, 2016, the victim C, who had a relationship with the victim C, found alcohol on the “E cafeteria” located in Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, and claimed alcohol; (b) but, on the ground that the victim refused to do so, obstructed the victim’s business by avoiding disturbance, such as breaking the beer’s disease at the entrance of the restaurant, which was at the entrance of the restaurant.

B. On May 6, 2016, at around 15:02, the Defendant: (a) found drunk on the “E restaurant” above; and (b) took a bath for approximately 10 minutes without any reason, and obstructed the victim’s business operation by avoiding disturbance, such as taking a bath for about 10 minutes.

(c)

On May 6, 2016, the Defendant found the “E cafeteria” at around 17:36 on May 6, 2016 and obstructed the victim’s business operation by avoiding disturbance, such as talking with large sounds at the entrance of the restaurant without any reason.

2. On May 6, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the same location as C on May 6, 2016, the Defendant: (a) heard the Defendant’s interference with the duties from the police station of the Daejeon East Police Station, the police station of the Daejeon Eastern Police Station, and requested the Defendant to voluntarily accompany the Defendant along the earth; (b) talked that the Defendant would be forced to leave the said police station to inform the Defendant of his personal information; and (c) was laid off on the bottom of the said police officer’s request that the said police officer take a walk to the Defendant; and (d) Sheed off the upper bottom of the said police officer’s personal information; and (d) Sheed “I will grow off to drink in drinking in the same manner as C; and (d) interfere with the legitimate performance of duties by the police officer’s report on the handling of the police officer’s report on one occasion by hand.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police in relation to G;

1. C’s statement;

1. Three copies of the 112 reported case handling table;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business) and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties) for criminal facts and the choice of punishment, respectively.