The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged was as follows: “The Defendant, 2017 Highly 2629, was aware of the victim C with the customer who was on his/her own around May 2016.

On November 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the Defendant’s house located in Gyeonggi-gun, Gyeonggi-do, 2016, “The father’s funeral should be moved to the victim; and (b) money should be laid to the victim.

A group of 30,000,000 won and 30,000 won is a group, and when the time limit is transferred, the payment will be made on February 17, 2017.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not hold a meeting of accounts equivalent to KRW 30 million, and there was no particular property or income, and even if he borrowed money from the victim with personal debt, he did not have the intention or ability to repay until the due date.

The Defendant deceptioned as above and acquired a copy of the check from the injured party on November 28, 2016, which is equivalent to KRW 10 million.

From February 24, 2017, the defendant of "2018 Highly 473" shall do so.

3. Until December 22, 200, the Defendant did not live in the apartment leased by the victim C, the Gyeonggi-gun E Apartment-gun, 101 Dong 1101, because of the facility problems such as heating, etc., and lived in the apartment after obtaining the consent of the victim.

Defendant for the same year

3. Around 22. 08:30, at the request of the injured party, the victim out of the above apartment complex and stolen one electric cleaning machine equivalent to 110,000 won at the market price, which the injured party purchased in advance to use at the time of occupancy, without permission of the injured party.

2. According to the records, the fact that the Defendant received a copy of a check from the injured party in the amount of KRW 10 million from the victim, and the Defendant left with one electronic file, one electric cleaning machine (hereinafter “electronic stamp, etc.”) and one electric cleaning machine, respectively, is recognized.

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant is the victim only by the evidence submitted by the prosecutor.