logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.17 2017나20622
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, with the exception of “the second order” below, and thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence

2. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance in the same part is as follows: “In the materials storage and rest room (hereinafter “instant materials storage and rest room”) of the second E 2nd E 1, 2, “E 2, a materials storage and rest room (hereinafter “this case’s materials storage and rest room”)” and “the rest room of this case” and “the rest room of this case.”

from 'I' to 'I'.

The grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, the 5th to 6th 10 pages are as follows.

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is that the fire of this case occurred due to electrical factors, such as damage of smoke-saving clothes due to electrical heat in the vicinity of the materials storage and the rest room in the instant case, and that the materials storage and rest room in the instant case are installed and occupied by Defendant A without permission.

However, Defendant A only caused fire risks due to electrical factors by performing the construction of facilities in the E store in which the material storage and rest rooms of this case are located, while Defendant A did not take proper safety measures, such as electric wires flowing out from the outside are disturbed and easily burned articles, in the material storage of this case.

Therefore, Defendant A shall be liable for damages under Article 758(1) of the Civil Act or Article 750 of the Civil Act to Defendant A who suffered damage from the instant fire, and the Defendant Company shall be liable for compensation under Article 724(2) of the Commercial Act as the insurer of the Defendant A. The Defendants shall be jointly and severally liable to compensate for damage under Article 682 of the Commercial Act. The Defendants shall be jointly and severally liable to pay the Plaintiff, who subrogated and acquired the damage claim under Article 682 of the Commercial Act, the total sum of the insurance money paid by the Plaintiff

The judgment of the court of first instance.

arrow