The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

With respect to the crime of interference with business and violence against each crime listed in the judgment below 2017 Gooman 2791, the defendant, as a customer, was only limited to a claim to the extent that he/she can normally resist, and there is no fact that he/she interferes with the business of the victim or forced him/her to contain any original flag and death into the victim.

With respect to each crime of injury, the victims only responded to the defense of the disaster, and the extent of the situation suffered by the victims is minor and the victims suffered injury.

subsection (b) of this section.

With respect to the obstruction of the performance of official duties, it is the minimum resistance that has been punished in the course of excessive suppression by correctional officers.

There is no fact that there was an assault by correctional officers on the crime of 2017 Highest 337 of the judgment of the court below.

The punishment sentenced by the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court regarding each crime set forth in the judgment of the lower court as to the assertion of misunderstanding of facts, the victim D has consistently made a statement that corresponds to the facts charged in this part from the investigative agency to the court below. The above statement conforms to the content of on-site photographs, CCTV-scapping photographs, the video images taken by witnesses, and the arrest report on the occurrence of the case prepared by the police officer sent to the police officer due to a report by the victim, and there is no other reason to suspect the credibility of the statement, this part of the facts charged is guilty.

The following circumstances, which are acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, are consistent with the investigation agency from the investigation agency to the court of the court below, and the victim F and G consistently make statements corresponding to this part of the facts charged.