The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal [misunderstanding of facts as to the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act], although the defendant did not have committed an injury jointly with C at the time of this part of the charges, the court below convicted him of this part of the charges, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., the victim stated consistently from the investigative agency to the court of the court below to the effect that "the victim was assaulted as stated in this part of the facts charged at the time"; ii) the police officer called to the scene upon receiving a report from the police station to the effect that "the police officer called to the scene upon receiving a report that two people were dead at the time. The victim was faced with the victim's name and face, etc., and the victim was asked to ask the victim about the situation, and the victim was assaulted by two persons, such as the defendant." At the court of the court of the court below, the defendant's child-friendly was pushed with the victim's desire. At the time, the defendant-friendly statement was made by the defendant using anything similar to the combined board, and it was consistent with the victim's statement; iii) the victim's statement corresponds to the above facts at the time of assault and the defendant's statement to the effect that "the defendant was guilty as well aware of the above facts."

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is justified.