beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. From June 4, 2012 to December 28, 2015, the Plaintiff was the president of the Dong-gu, Ulsan-gu Council of lessees to the apartment apartment C, Ulsan-gu, as the president, and the Defendant is the controlled entity of the above apartment.
At around 10:00 on June 9, 2015, the defendant (the plaintiff) was aware of the fact that the defendant (the plaintiff) replaced the defendant's house management office of the above C apartment with the new management office (E) from the victim Eul corporation, the housing management company of the above C apartment, to the new management office (E), and obstructed the affairs of the defendant's issuance of the apartment management office, such as the issuance of force by force of the victim by force, by forcing the defendant to enter the management office without obtaining the prior consent of the defendant who is the representative director of the Dong-gu, the defendant (the plaintiff).
B. Around 2016, the Defendant filed a complaint against the Plaintiff during the investigation period due to suspicion of interference with business, defamation, etc.
As a result of the investigation by the police and the prosecution, the plaintiff was suspected of being guilty of a part of the suspicion of defamation due to the lack of evidence, and was charged with the remaining suspicion of defamation and interference with business.
Accordingly, on January 20, 2017, the Plaintiff appealed and filed a formal trial. On January 20, 2017, the Ulsan District Court found the Plaintiff guilty of interfering with the Plaintiff’s business and sentenced him/her not guilty of a fine of KRW 1.5 million (No. 2016No. 867), and the Plaintiff appealed, but the appellate court dismissed the Plaintiff’s appeal on May 19, 2017.
(Ulsan District Court 2017No153). Specific facts constituting the crime of interference with business are as follows.
C. On the other hand, the defendant against the plaintiff in relation to this.