beta
Text
1. E- 456 square meters of forest land in Kimpo-si:
A. Defendant C is each of the Plaintiffs’ marks 1, 14, 4, 3, 2, and 1 of the separate drawings.
Reasons
1. In the absence of dispute, the fact that: (a) the E Forest E- 456 square meters is 456 square meters; (b) the Plaintiffs each share of 221/456; and (c) the Defendants each share of 7/456 shares; and (d) the actual fact that the Plaintiffs each share of 7/456 square meters in the ship as indicated in the order of the Plaintiffs; and (b) the Defendants occupy the parts of 442
2. Determination
A. According to the above facts of recognition, a mutual title trust relationship between the Plaintiffs and the Defendants on the part owned by each of their respective specific owners in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si is established, and such mutual title trust relationship can be terminated at any time, and the instant complaint, stating the Plaintiffs’ intent to terminate the mutual title trust, reached Defendant C on October 8, 2018 and October 11, 2018, is apparent in the record.
Therefore, Defendant C is obligated to take procedures for the registration of ownership transfer with respect to each share of 221/912 out of part 14 square meters in the above ship from the Plaintiffs on October 8, 2018 on the ground that the title trust is terminated on October 8, 2018. At the same time, Defendant C is obligated to take procedures for the registration of ownership transfer with respect to each share of 7/912 square meters out of the above part 442 square meters in the above part 14 square meters in the above ship on October 8, 2018. Defendant D is obligated to take procedures for the registration of ownership transfer for each share of 221/912 square meters out of the two parts in the above part 14 square meters in the above ship on October 11, 2018 with respect to each share of 7/912 square meters in the above part 14 square meters in the above ship on the ground that the title trust is terminated on October 11, 2018.
B. As to this, the Defendants’ assertion is without merit, since the part of 14 square meters in the above ship falls short of the minimum divided area, and thus, the division is impossible, or the execution of judgment is impossible. Therefore, the Defendants’ assertion is without merit.
3. Conclusion.