The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. It is reasonable to respect the sentencing conditions compared with the first instance court, if the sentencing of the first instance does not change, and the sentencing of the first instance does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). The lower court: (a) under favorable circumstances to the Defendant, the Defendant recognized one’s mistake while leading to the confession of each of the instant crimes; (b) the Defendant’s blood concentration is not high; (c) the Defendant did not cause any other injury, such as traffic accidents; (d) the Defendant provided efforts to prevent recidivism; (e) the Defendant is obliged to support the children of the first instance court with the intellectual disability of the first instance court; (b) the Defendant appears to have relatively clear social relationship; (c) the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 10-year imprisonment with prison labor for a vehicle with the same kind of crime; and (e) the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 10-year driver’s license for a vehicle without the same traffic driver’s license for 6 months or more.

Considering each other that it is difficult to see, and