1. Defendant D’s KRW 1,00,000 for Plaintiff A and for this, KRW 5% per annum from September 9, 2018 to May 14, 2019.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 24, 2012, Plaintiff A and Defendant E reported their marriage on December 24, 2012, and generated Friday G with marriage life, and Defendant D’s attachment to Defendant E.

B. Plaintiff B, the Plaintiff’s father, is operating the I Child Care Center in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H (hereinafter “instant Child Care Center”). Plaintiff A’s mother is the head of the instant Child Care Center, and Plaintiff A is the head of the instant Child Care Center.

The child care center of this case is a child care center facility of up to three floors above ground with the building of the second and fourth floors above ground, and the fourth floor is a residential space in which the plaintiffs reside.

C. After marriage, Defendant E lived with the Plaintiffs on the fourth floor of the instant child-care center building, and after having given birth to G, Defendant E was in charge of child-care mainly with the instant child-care center.

On November 9, 2014, Defendant E asked the Plaintiff to leave the church on the fourth floor of the instant childcare center building, and asked the Plaintiff to leave G temporarily.

The plaintiff Gap, who was dissatisfied with the plaintiff Eul's attending a church and demanding his religious life, refused to do so on the ground that the duty of the child-care center of this case is bad, and the dispute between the plaintiff Eul and the defendant E began.

Defendant E was assaulted by the Plaintiff and reported to the police, and the police dispatched were organized in front of the fourth floor entrance, along with the Defendant E, and the Plaintiff B and C forcedly deducted the G in which Defendant E was inside, emphasizing the resistance of Defendant E, and forced it to take away.

Defendant E, after undergoing the police investigation, went to the child care center of this case with Defendant D, but the Plaintiffs had a wind to prevent the entry of the Defendants due to changes in the password of the present official, and Defendant E had no choice but to leave G to Plaintiff A and Defendant E had a separate choice from that time.

E. Defendant E against Plaintiff A on November 21, 2014, the Seoul Family Court 2014ddan324235 (main office).