1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship between the parties 1) Defendant C is the G Child Care Center located in the G Child Care Center F from June 1, 2017 to the macro-si (hereinafter “instant Child Care Center”).

(2) The Plaintiff A was the mother of the Plaintiff B (H) and the Plaintiff B began to attend the first half of the child care center of this case from June 1, 2017, which Defendant C was the representative of the child care center of this case, and Defendant D entered the employment contract with Defendant C. The Plaintiff A was the mother of the Plaintiff B (H) and the Plaintiff B started to attend the first half of the child care center of this case.

나. 다툼의 발단 1) 원고 A은 원고 B이 엉덩이를 때리는 듯한 시늉을 하고, 말을 더듬는 증상을 보이자 어린이집에서 학대를 당하는 것이 아닌가 의심하게 되어 결국 2017. 6. 16. 원고 B으로 하여금 어린이집을 그만 다니도록 하였다. 2) 원고 A은 2017. 6. 16. 피고 C에게 전화하여 ‘다른 엄마들에게 피고 C의 아동학대 사실을 알리고, 감사가 나오도록 하겠다. 피고 C가 눈앞에 있었으면 때렸을 것이다’라는 취지로 말하고, 2017. 6. 24.경 ‘어린이집을 뒤집겠다’는 취지로 말하여 피고 C를 협박하였으며, 한편, 2017. 6. 23.에는 ‘피고 C가 원고 B을 학대하였다’는 취지의 글(이하 ‘이 사건 게시물’이라 한다)을 자신의 사회 관계망 서비스(Social Network Service)인 J 계정(이하 ‘J’이라 한다)에 게시하였다.

In addition, on June 23, 2017, Plaintiff A demanded Defendant E to set kneel kelel and knee in front of Plaintiff A, and the representative of the above child care center and the president of the above child care center demand the Internet to open an open door to the public. The Plaintiff also told Defendant C to the effect that “The posting of the instant notice to J, and the other members of the Council are on the same content. If Defendant C was well released at the child care center, the situation may be avoided.”

Accordingly, Defendant D’s requirements to Defendant C on June 24, 2017 are the requirements of Defendant C to the Plaintiff.