1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following dismissal, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

(However, the part regarding Codefendant C and B in the first instance judgment, which became separately final and conclusive, is not included). The "defendants" in the first instance judgment, are "Defendants and Codefendant C and B in the first instance judgment," "Defendant C" as "Codefendant C in the first instance trial," and "Defendant B" as "Codefendant B in the first instance trial," respectively.

The third part of the judgment of the first instance is "one personal compensation for the personal injury" of the 16-17th part of the judgment of the first instance as "one personal compensation for the personal injury."

Each of the "traffic Accidents" in the 5th, 6th, 6th, 6th, 9th, 7th, 15th, and 16th, shall be deemed to be the "accident" of the first instance judgment.

The May 1, 198 of the first instance court's fifth 16th efficiencies "in consideration of over-speed".

The second part of the judgment of the first instance is that “compensation claim” in the first part of the judgment, “B 1 through 4” in the third part is “B 1 through B”, “L hospital” in the first part is “L hospital of the court of the first instance”, and “M association” in the 14th part is “M association of the court of the first instance.” The fourth part of the judgment of the first instance is that “from February 28, 2012 to March 5, 2015” in the 4th part of the 8th part of the judgment of the first instance is that “from February 28, 2012 to March 5, 2015”. The second part of the judgment of the first instance is that “from February 28, 2012 to March 5, 2015.”

(Supreme Court Decision 94Da48257 delivered on October 12, 1995). However, the phrase “ is this (see Supreme Court Decision 94Da48257 delivered on October 12, 1995).” The phrase “the result of appraisal by the MM Association” in Article 11 subparag. 9 of the first instance judgment is “the result of appraisal by the court of first instance,” and the phrase “automobile insurance contract” in Article 10 is “the result of appraisal by the court of first instance,” respectively, “the automobile insurance contract” in Article 12 subparag. 5 of the first instance judgment.