logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.24 2017가합529293
임대차계약 해지 등
Text

1. The defendant shall display (attached Form 1) in the first floor of the building indicated in the indication of the building in the attached list from the plaintiff, (1), (2), (3).

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. (1) On May 26, 2015, the Plaintiff entered the building indicated in the attachment list owned by the Defendant on May 26, 2015 (hereinafter “instant building”).

(1) The indication of (Attachment Form 1) in the first floor (Attached Form 1) (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (7), (8), (9), (1) in the part (Ga) and 253.23 square meters in the ship connected each point in sequence, (1) in the same section (Attached Form 1), (2), (3), (1) in the part (Na), (29.25 square meters in the ship (Na), and (1) in the order of each point, and (1) in the second floor of the building of this case (Attached Form 2), (2), (3), (4), (5), (7), (8), (9), (1) in the order of each point, and (3) in the aggregate of (Ga) parts connected each point.75 square meters in the ship (hereinafter referred to as

(2) Each of the following was leased on June 22, 202: (a) the head of household exhibition, sales place, and office for use; (b) the deposit for lease; (c) KRW 35,000,000 for monthly rent (excluding value added tax; (d) monthly rent of KRW 2,50,000 for monthly management expenses (in addition to value-added tax; (e) monthly rent of KRW 2,50,000 for monthly management expenses; and (c) the term of lease from June 22, 2015 to June 22, 2020 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

(2) The Plaintiff paid KRW 500,000,000 to the Defendant at the time of the conclusion of the instant lease agreement. Around that time, the Plaintiff received the instant store transferred from the Defendant and operated the instant store at the instant store until the date of closing argument, while occupying and using the instant store.

3) On June 24, 2015, from around July 23, 2015 to around July 23, 2015, the Plaintiff spent KRW 167,860,00 (including value-added tax) of the interior of this case’s construction cost of additional interior medicine construction cost of KRW 3,850,00 (including value-added tax) on August 3, 2015, and KRW 770,00 (including value-added tax) of the cost for the separation of electrical circuit construction cost of KRW 172,480,00 (including value-added tax) (i.e., KRW 3,860,000, KRW 3,850,000, KRW 770,000) on total for business activities, such as household display, sales, etc. in the store of this case.

arrow