A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 6, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, on or around the Seo-gu Daejeon Police Station C District of Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon, on April 23:18, 2016, the Defendant, a guest, before the Seo-gu, Daejeon Police Station C District, and the Defendant, a guest, without getting off the train, her seated with a slope E (43 tax) that confirms the identity of the Defendant, who was divingd from the taxi according to the D’s report, without any justifiable reason, can bit a bit of a bitch bitch.

Dun's knowledge, etc., and assaulted by breabbling breath, etc., which interfered with legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression, investigation, etc. of crime without justifiable grounds.

2. The Defendant damaged public goods in the said C Zone, while putting the police officers at the same place, destroyed the sum of repairing costs to the sum of KRW 150,000,00,000, including four monitors installed above the civil petition reception stand, telephone, one printer, and one facsimile.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing field photographs, estimates, and CCTV images;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties, the choice of imprisonment), and Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of damaging goods for public use and the choice of imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. An unfavorable circumstance is that the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act is poor, that the victimized police officers want to punish the defendant, and that there are many criminal records of violence.

It is advantageous to the fact that the crime is recognized and reflected.

In addition, the sentence shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the overall sentencing conditions shown in the pleadings of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, etc.