logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2014.11.13 2014고합276
살인
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for four years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant as the father of the victim D(the age of 40) and the victim’s relationship have supported the victim who lives together with the Defendant without any particular occupation after his retirement from high school as a taxi engineer.

2. The victim of the defendant's complaint against the victim was placed in alcohol addiction while living without any particular occupation in support of the defendant. Around May 2009, the victim argued that the victim was suffering from injury due to alcohol addiction and violent nature, such as alcohol addiction and violent nature, such as drinking and late drinking.

In addition, the victim was punished by self-harm if the defendant was unable to drink, and the victim was also willing to borrow money to the four people for fraud.

Therefore, even though the Defendant had the victim hospitalized in the F Hospital for the treatment of alcohol addiction from around 2004 to around 2010, it was difficult for the victim to refuse hospitalization and to properly treat the victim with the economic aspect, such as hospital expenses and mother and child.

In the meantime, the defendant was able to encourage the victim to live independently from the defendant while leaving part of the money that he received by disposing of a private taxi on or around 2013. However, the victim was only able to drink with the money that he received from the defendant.

3. The Defendant, around 10:00 on August 31, 2014, reported with the above E that the victim suffers from alcohol dementia, and reported the appearance of beer and beerer and beer in the front of Ulsan-gu G sperm, the Defendant’s residence, and returned to the said residence around 19:30.

The defendant reported that there was no victim at the time when he returned to the above residence, asked the above E to what extent the victim did, and asked the above E to the effect that he did so.

arrow