logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.08.31 2017나2015889
물품대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as stated in the part of the judgment of the first instance except for the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance as stated in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of the first instance is just in finding and determining the facts of the first instance court even in light of the evidence No. 3 submitted by the defendant at the trial, and there is no error as alleged in the grounds of appeal by the defendant). 2. The part of the first instance court's decision No. 14 of the second instance court's decision No. 2, which was written after the second instance court's decision No. 2, which was written by the defendant, was amended to "Nive iron Co., Ltd." (hereinafter referred to as "

A. On the 31st day of the first instance judgment, the 3th day of the 3th day of the 15th instance judgment “(i.e., the additional order quantity of 1,014,051kg pursuant to the instant supply contract)” was “(i.e., the 1,014,051k additional order quantity of 289,804kg additional order quantity of 1,014,012k pursuant to the instant supply contract).” By the 30th day of the same month “B” until the 31th day of the same month.

A. On the 4th judgment of the first instance court, “23% of the ex-factory price of the H-type lecture” was “590,000 won per ton and KRW 18.6% of the ex-factory price of the H-type lecture (small standard).”

A. According to the first instance court’s first instance judgment, “1,014,051kg” is “1,014,051kg (actual order quantity 1,014,012k)” and the fourth instance judgment’s second instance judgment “289,804kg” is “289,843kg”.

A. According to the 6th decision of the court of first instance, the term “interest” in the 6th decision of the court of first instance shall be deemed to read “interest that has occurred (if the amount is less than that in calculation)”.

3. The decision of the court of first instance is justified, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow