1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation concerning this case are as stated in the part of the judgment of the first instance except for the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance as stated in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance is to be determined as follows: [The fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justifiable even if the plaintiff and the defendant met each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 26 through 28 and Eul evidence Nos. 7 through 13 (including paper numbers) submitted by the court of first instance, and there are no errors as alleged by the defendant as the grounds for appeal).] 2. The portion used by the court of first instance as of February 3, 200, "work" under the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and there are no errors in engaging in the business related to asbestos at that time."

A. According to the first instance judgment No. 9, the second sentence “(s)” shall be read as “(s)” (s).

A. According to the 10th decision of the first instance court, the Plaintiff’s “Plaintiff” in the 8th decision shall be deemed to be “Plaintiff A”.

A. The first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance judgment’s first instance judgment’s first instance judgment’s first instance judgment’s first instance judgment’s first instance judgment’s second instance judgment (“Plaintiff’s second instance judgment”) (“Plaintiff’s second instance judgment”) was written as “(h)”, and then, the lower court’s second instance judgment’s second instance judgment’s second instance judgment

A. On June 1, 2019, the first instance court’s first instance court’s “12% per annum prescribed by the Act on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings” was amended by Presidential Decree No. 29768 on May 21, 2019 and enforced on June 1, 2019, 12% per annum, which is the statutory interest rate under the amended provisions, shall apply from June 1, 2019, and thus, the Plaintiffs’ damages for delay seeking more than 12% per annum shall not be accepted.”

3. The decision of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.