A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 2017, the Defendant had the Defendant set up a complaint with respect to C and D using a computer in the influent area below the west-to-west-to-west in the ethic City of C and D.

A written complaint states that "The defendant's wife C and C conspired to transfer the building permit, etc. to D, and the defendant affixed his/her seal impression affixed on the written consent for transfer and acquisition, thereby forging a written consent for transfer and acquisition, and submitted it to the public for the purpose of viewing and exercising the same." The defendant agrees to prepare the written consent for transfer and acquisition, thereby allowing C to deliver his/her seal impression to C and affix his/her seal on the written consent for transfer and acquisition, and C and D did not have forged the written consent for transfer and acquisition and the personal seal impression of the defendant."

Nevertheless, on January 16, 2017, the defendant submitted the above complaint to the police officer who could not know his name at the police station of the Seosung Seo-gu, Seoyang-dong, Namyang-dong, Namyang-dong, Namyang-dong, Namyang-dong, 570.

Accordingly, the defendant, C and D, for the purpose of having C and D receive criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by C by the witness in the third public trial protocol;

1. Statement made by the police against the defendant;

1. Complaint;

1. Response to a request for appraisal;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning telephone statement listening;

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Summary of the assertion

A. The Defendant did not grant C or D the right to permit the construction of a new ground house and the right to permit the development of the above land, which was F 486 square meters of land owned by C or D (hereinafter “instant land”), and did not grant C or D the right to make a written consent to transfer of each of the above rights (hereinafter “instant consent”).

B. The Defendant does not have any indication on the head of the Defendant’s seal impression, and has any certificate of seal impression.