Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On July 16, 2016, the Defendant had sexual intercourse under the agreement with male-parent-gu C’s friendship D, and thereafter, C heard the horses that “the Defendant used C’s female-friendly job offers to commit this bullying,” and led D to a religious belief.

On August 8, 2016, the Defendant prepared and submitted a false complaint on D in the form of the accusation that is located in the above police station, with the aim of having D receive criminal punishment, at the police station of the Seongbuk-si, Namyang-si, Nam-do, Nam-do, Nam-do, 570, and at having D obtain criminal punishment.

The chief of the complaint filed the complaint "(D) has been punished for sexual assault from D who is a soldier, and D has sexual intercourse with the defendant under the agreement of the defendant."

Accordingly, the defendant reported false facts to the public official and made it impossible for him to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects, prepared by the public prosecutor regarding D;

1. Statement made to the accused on the preparation of the warning;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a complaint, investigative report (report on the result of execution of a communications warrant for victims and review of submission of suspect data);

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 156 of the Selection of Punishment Act;

1. Articles 157, 153, and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act to be mitigated by law;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (a favorable consideration of the reasons for sentencing) are as follows: (b) the Defendant recognized all criminal facts and led to confession by being investigated; (c) the first offender who has no record of punishment so far; and (d) the Defendant’s age was 18 years old; and (e) the Defendant’s age was lower than that of 18; and (e) considered all the conditions for sentencing revealed in the trial process.