A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 8. 3. 04:20경 서울 강서구 B 앞에서 주취자가 행패를 부리고 있다는 112신고를 접수 받고 현장에 출동한 C 순61호 차량의 앞 범퍼 부위를 아무 이유 없이 발로 2회 걷어차던 중, 정복을 입은 경찰관인 D지구대 소속 경위 E, 경사 F로부터 제지를 당하게 되자, “야. 시발 놈들아. 뭐야”라고 욕설을 하면서 위 경사 F의 근무복을 잡아당기고 발로 그의 허벅지와 배 부위를 수 회 걷어차고, 경위 E의 얼굴을 향해 침을 뱉으면서 발로 그의 허벅지를 수 회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on crime prevention.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police statement to F and E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution [Scope of the punishment of recommending] Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Official Duties (Article 62(1) (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution of Official Duties) where the basic area (Article 6-1 and 1-4 months) [Special Mitigation] [Article 6-1] where the degree of assault, intimidation, and deceptive scheme is minor / Where there are many damaged public officials (Article 1) / [decision of sentence] where the defendant committed assault and assault to police officers in the course of performing official duties together with his/her desire, the nature and conduct of the defendant without any criminal record, and the degree of the obstruction of performance of official duties such as assault and assault, etc. are not deemed particularly heavy, the sentence shall be determined as ordered and the execution of the sentence shall be suspended by taking into account