logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.06.20 2014노1026
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that each sentence of the court below (one hundred and twenty years of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, five million won of fine, probation, community service, confiscation, and additional collection) is too uneasy and unreasonable.

2. Determination of the act of arranging sexual traffic is an unfavorable circumstance to the Defendants, such as the following: (a) the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a considerable social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women’s sex; (b) the act of arranging sexual traffic is in need of a simple and serious punishment in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture; (c) the Defendants had been sentenced to a fine for the same sexual traffic; and (d) the act of arranging sexual traffic again

However, on the other hand, the court below seems to have determined punishment by fully considering the circumstances unfavorable to the Defendants, and it seems that there was no change in circumstances that could vary from the judgment below and the punishment of the Defendants, and the Defendants were committed the crime of this case, and the Defendants were committed by committing the crime of this case for about three months, and the Defendants were divided by wrong means of confinement life for about three months, and the Defendants were living in good faith and lead their family members, and thus, the risk of recidivism seems to be low. In full view of other various sentencing conditions in the records and arguments, such as the Defendants’ age and behavior environment, the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed unfair because each sentence of the court below against the Defendants is too uneas

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow