All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the reasons for appeal is that each sentence of the court below (the fine of KRW 7,00,000 and confiscation; the fine of KRW 10,000,000 and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The facts that the Defendants led to the confession of the instant crime and the mistake are divided, and that there is no same criminal power, etc. are favorable to the Defendants.

On the other hand, however, the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and requires a simple and strict punishment in order to prevent the proliferation of illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture, there is no change in circumstances that differs from the judgment of the court below and the punishment. In addition, taking into account the various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments such as the profits and operating of the instant sexual traffic establishments, the period of business, the defendants' age, criminal records, criminal records before and after the crime, etc., the punishment of the court below against the defendants is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the Defendants’ appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that there are no grounds for appeal. It is so decided as per Disposition.