logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.05.18 2015고합328
마약류관리에관한법률위반(대마)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall trade marijuana, and carry it for the purpose of smoking or smoking.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) sold, possessed, and smoked marijuana over five times in total, from the time of purchasing marijuana, to August 26, 2015, from the time of the purchase of the hemp in the name of the non-registered female upon the request of E, after 2-3 days from the male in the name of the Plaintiff at D University located in Seoul, and after the request of E before the university, the Defendant: (b) sold, possessed, and smoked marijuana over a total of five times from the time of the purchase of the hemp in the name of the non-registered female upon the request of E, even though the Defendant is not a narcotics handler; (c) around 15:00 on April 20, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement statement (in relation to the trade of marijuana No. 1 in the crime sight table No. 1, the Defendant purchased from the police officer on April 2015, during the period from April 2015, the same year from the police officer on April 2015;

6. From the bottom of an empty pet disease to the middleman, placing the bottom of the empty pet disease in a pet bottle where it is well-filled by water, removing the lids of the empty pet disease, raising the lids of the empty pets, and making the lids of the empty pets on the front day of the hemps, and then removing the hemps from the pet of the hemps by attaching fire to the hemps, and then smoking in a way of spreading the hemps by spreading the smokes within the empty pets by adding fire to the hemps.

Around June 13, 2015, the defendant made a statement, and around June 13, 2015, the written statement by the police about F to the effect that the defendant had witness to smoke in marijuana in the above manner at the defendant's home and the date and time F visited the defendant's home are sufficient to guarantee the authenticity of confession in this part.

1. Protocol of seizure (Evidence No. 14);

1. An investigation report (as to the replys to and analysis of the statements of informants and suspects), an investigation report (as to the response of the party against the party against the party against whom the warrant has been raised and the results of the appraisal by the State on the party against whom the warrant has been served), an investigation report (as to the confiscated plant and the response

arrow