1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The Plaintiff’s lien exists with respect to real estate listed in the attached list No. 1.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) E, F, G, and H (hereinafter “owners”) are new construction of the instant loan and transfer of construction cost claims.

) The Dogra (J building; hereinafter referred to as “the Dogra”) of 18 households on three parcels, Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I and 3.

on March 23, 2002, the Note General Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “State General Construction”)

B) Between the building owner and the building owner provided the above land as the site of the instant loan and newly constructed the said loan by securing the construction cost, but with respect to the construction cost, the building owner entered into an agreement to promote the transfer of ownership to a person designated by the Jeju General Construction Co., Ltd. on September 30, 2002 at the time of the completion of the new construction work to allow the said 11 households from among the 18 households of the instant loan. (ii) On September 30, 2002, the building owner again entered into an agreement with the Korea General Construction Co., Ltd. on September 30, 2002 to divide the 7 households from the instant loan and the remaining 11 households from the Jeju General Construction Co., Ltd., and at the same time the building owner completed the construction, at the same time, the Jeju General Construction Co., Ltd. entered into an additional agreement to register the ownership of the said 11 households into with the

3) The Song-do Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “ Song-dok”) is called Song-dok.

(2) On October 16, 2002, the Plaintiff was awarded a subcontract for Integlass Construction in the amount of KRW 2,05,000,000 for Integlass Construction from Inglass Construction, and completed the above Inglass Construction on or around May 2003, but the Note completed the Inglass Construction, but the construction price (hereinafter “the instant subcontract price”).

In principle, on August 19, 2003, the State shall pay the full amount of the construction cost to the General Construction Division in cash. However, from August 19, 2003 to August 19, 2003, the State General Construction shall be referred to as the "fourth generation of this case" among four households of this case from August 19, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the "real estate of this case"), Nos. 101, 303 and 603, and hereinafter referred to as the "fourth generation of this case").

A. B. E. B. H. H.T.