logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.05.18 2014나54108
소유권이전등기
Text

1. Upon receiving a claim for a change in exchange at the trial after the second return, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 572,500,000.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

(a) 1) Conclusion of a project implementation agreement with the Defendant, C, F, and G (hereinafter collectively referred to as “owners”);

) The 18 household units of “I building” of the size of the 1st underground and the 6th ground level on the ground on the land outside Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seocho-gu and 3 lots owned by them (hereinafter “instant Ba”).

On March 23, 2002, the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) decided to newly construct and on March 23, 2002

The owner of the building provides the above site as the project site following the new construction of the loan of this case, and entered into an agreement for the promotion of the project with the intent of the participant to newly construct the loan of this case by raising the construction cost as follows. The main contents of the agreement are as follows:

(7) The interim payment of the owner's progress payment shall not exceed the above amount and the above amount shall be refunded to the owner at the time of the transfer of the registration. Article 7 (Preservation, Registration and Provisional Registration) ① Transfer of the ownership of the site to a person designated by the participant at the time of the preservation registration after the completion of the construction. ② In addition, from among the 18 generation units of this case, lending Nos. 101, 102, 201, 202, 303, 402, 403, 403, 503, 601, 602, and 603 total number of 11 households designated by the participant at the time of completion of the construction. ⑤ The owner of the building shall have the ownership of the site at the time of completion of the construction, and the remainder of the construction by the intervenor shall be re-divided between the intervenor and the new construction of this case.

arrow