The judgment below

Among them, the guilty part against the Defendants, L, M, N,O, P, Q, R, and T respectively.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant A’s 10 million won received from B on August 27, 2010 from the Defendants’ assertion of misunderstanding of facts or misapprehension of legal principles is not acquired as consideration for entering AJ by receiving a request from B to enter AJ. The above money is merely paid for supporting AH and axis, and there was no quid pro quo relation between AJ’s entry into the AI, and there was no perception of the Defendant’s quid pro quo. (2) As to the violation of trust, the Defendant did not receive an illegal solicitation from B to allow students to enter the AI, and there was no fact that the Defendant received from B, and it was not unjust solicitation from B to allow B to arbitrarily enter the interrogation of evidence for children AP to enter the protocol, and there was no fact that the Defendant received from B, “the Defendant’s arbitrary solicitation from AP to be admitted” to be “the Defendant’s arbitrary solicitation from AP to be admitted,” and that it was unlawful for BP to be admitted as “the Defendant’s arbitrary solicitation to be admitted.”