The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is reasonable in full view of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, including the fact that the defendant had a history of criminal punishment several times for the same or similar crimes, and that the defendant had a history of driving without a license again during the suspension period of the execution of imprisonment, which was punished for the same crime, and that the police officer had been discovered, and that the defendant has fleded to the six vehicles parked on the alleyway while avoiding the direction of stopping and avoiding the trend of the patrol, and that the defendant continued to abscond after the destruction and damage, and that the defendant repented his mistake, and that the defendant is against himself, and that the defendant would not drive the motor vehicle again by selling the vehicle, and that the defendant would not drive the motor vehicle again, and that the damage was recovered with the insurance money, and that the victims were the preference of the defendant, as well as other circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as age, character and behavior, environment, family relationship, the process and process of the crime, the result of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.