A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:30 on March 1, 2014, the Defendant met part of the vehicle, “The same shall apply ............................... 23:30, the Defendant committed assault, such as following: (a) the captain of the subsidiary, the police station, and the chief of the police station of the Ka-Sa Police Station, who called the scene, voluntarily escaped without any justifiable reason while gathering the statement of the reporter; (b) the Doc police station; (c) the Doc police station of the Ka-Sa Police Station, who driven the taxi; and (d) the Doc, the knick away from the taxi; (d) the Doc police station; (e) the Doc police station, and (e) the knick away from the taxi; and (e) the Dock knicked off the left floor

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that the defendant has no previous conviction or fine in excess of the same kind of crime or fine) or more;