The punishment against the Defendants shall be provided for in six months by imprisonment.

However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, the Defendants are the defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B and Defendant A are women.

피고인들은 2018. 9. 10. 19:40경 서울 중랑구 C에 있는 피해자 주식회사 D가 운영하는 E매장 1층에서, 보안요원들의 감시를 피해 시가 24,990원 상당의 진홍삼꿀차 1개, 34,990원 상당의 아카시아, 밤꿀 혼합세트 1개, 6,290원 상당의 데어리 아이스크림 1개, 8,990원 상당의 시나몬 허니버터 2개, 42,990원 상당의 샌디스크 64GB 1개 등 시가 합계 127,240원 상당의 물품 6개를 가지고 온 갈색 루이비똥 가방 1개 및 장바구니 2개에 나누어 담고, 피고인 B은 위 물건을 담은 검정색 장바구니 1개와 초록색 장바구니 1개를 들고 그 위를 옷으로 덮어 가방을 가린 뒤 계산대를 지나가고, 피고인 A은 위 물건들 중 일부를 담은 갈색 루이비똥 가방을 들고 계산대를 지나쳐 밖으로 연결되는 엘리베이터 앞까지 나갔다.

As a result, the defendants stolen the victim's property together.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Investigation report (the form and photograph of the suspect as at the time of saving);

1. Defendant B and his defense counsel asserted that Defendant B had no intention of larceny, as they had no awareness of the fact that Defendant B had to calculate the damaged goods receipts and photographs, and that Defendant B had any material that was not calculated due to health reasons for drinking water from time to time, and that the purchased goods had no intention of larceny.

Defendant

A and his/her defense counsel knew that Defendant B, his/her father, aware of the entry of goods into the accounting unit and other food coaches, and had yet to be calculated in a timely manner, and there are still facts by Defendant A, but they do not constitute a simple larceny.