A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2018. 5. 19. 03:45 경 여수시 B에 있는, ‘C’ 주점 앞 노상에서 피고인이 위 주점 업주에게 욕설을 하는 등 행패를 부린 사실로 112 신고가 접수되어 현장에 출동한 여수경찰서 D 지구대 경사 E와 경장 F이 피고인에게 사실 관계를 확인하려고 하자 화가 나, 욕설을 하면서 손으로 경장 F의 가슴을 1회 밀치고, 계속해서 이를 제지하던 경사 E의 가슴 부위를 1회 밀치고, 발로 위 E의 입술 부위를 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers on 112 reporting processing and crime prevention.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The sentence shall be determined as ordered by comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances, such as the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: (a) the fact that there is no criminal record of the same kind or imprisonment without prison labor or any heavier punishment; (b) the reflectivity; and (c) the Defendant’s age, sex, family relationship, environment, circumstances and result of the crime; and (d) the circumstances after the crime

Application of Statutes

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant, at the same time and place as indicated in the facts charged in the judgment, has the victim E and the victim F borrow kneelel kelelelel in the victim E and the victim F at a place where many unspecified persons, such as the above main store G, etc.

The victims were openly insulting, such as referring to the expression "h.".

2. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts charged in the judgment: The judgment dismissing the prosecution for cancellation of complaint filed by the victims after the institution of public prosecution under Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 327 subparag. 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act).