A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 01:50 on June 9, 2018, the Defendant received a request from the main employee of Mapo-gu Seoul underground 1st floor C, “a request to move out of the main employee,” and took a bath without complying therewith, and he was sent to the site after receiving a report from the main employee of the main employee, during which he was frighting, the Defendant took a bath for the said police officer, and continued to put the Defendant back, and the police officer f, f, who was sent to the site after receiving a report from the main employee of the main employee, f, who was called to the site. The police officer f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f, and f, f, f, f, f, f, f, f.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and E;

1. Application of respective Acts and subordinate statutes to victims of damage photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor as a matter of choice (the greatest number of force units related to violence and the degree of force used shall not be minor);

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the recognition of and reflect on crimes, and the absence of criminal records after 2008);

1. An order to attend a course under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;