logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.12.18 2018고단3272
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On February 28, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of road traffic laws at the Ulsan District Court on February 28, 2012, and a fine of KRW 4 million for a violation of road traffic laws at the Ulsan District Court on March 28, 2013.

【Crimes】

1. On September 14, 2018, the Defendant driven B rocketing vehicles under the influence of alcohol content of about 8.5km in the section of approximately 0.102% from the Do in front of the “NG” located north-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do to the Hannsan-gu, Ulsan-do, to the Tatonan Lane.

As a result, the Defendant had been punished twice or more as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, but had driven the above rocketing vehicle while under the influence of alcohol.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a rocketing vehicle in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

On September 14, 2018, the Defendant driven the above vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of 0.102% in blood around 22:00, while driving the vehicle, and led to the flow of the Oton ballast road near the reservoir in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do, from the erogate towards the erode.g., the Defendant.

At the time of night, the front door of the road flows along and the road was sleeped. Therefore, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to safely drive the brake and steering gear by accurately manipulating the front door and the right and the right and the right.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant changed the lane from three lanes to two lanes, and changed the lane to one lane in the future of the Defendant’s vehicle, and due to the negligence of broomping the lane in the future of the Defendant’s vehicle, the Defendant received the front wheeling part of the Dracker’s left front part of the said Dracker’s vehicle running in the same direction depending on the said three-lane of the said road (47 tax) from the victim C (47 years) who was driving in the same direction.

In this respect.

arrow