logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.01.24 2016고단3991
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 30, 2008, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the Violation of Road Traffic Act, and the Traffic Act, and the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million and five hundred thousand won by the same court on January 15, 2010.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a line-based vehicle B.

On August 26, 2016, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of 0.092% in alcohol level from around 21:05 on August 26, 2016, and proceeded at a speed of one-lane between the 4190 Asian East Service Center in front of the Eastern Service Center in the direction of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the city of the speed of the two-lane between the two-lanes.

At the same time, the signal lights are installed, and there was a vehicle that stops along the signal signal waiting ahead, so the driver of the vehicle is obliged to accurately operate the steering gear, brakes and other devices of the vehicle, and not drive the vehicle at such a speed or in such a manner as may inflict any danger and injury on others, depending on the road traffic situation and the structure and performance of the vehicle, and there was a duty of care to ensure the necessary distance to avoid the collision with the vehicle in front and prevent the accident.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to stop the signal waiting, thereby taking part of the part behind the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle behind the Defendant’s vehicle in the front part of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle, and due to the corresponding shock, the Defendant got off the instant part of the Victim’s E driver’s vehicle, which was under suspension of the signal waiting in front of the signal waiting. The Defendant got off the said part of the Defendant’s E driver’s vehicle after the instant part of the Defendant’s vehicle, which was under suspension of the signal waiting in front of the signal waiting.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s occupational negligence requires approximately two weeks of injury to the victim C, and approximately two weeks of injury to the need for medical treatment to the victim E.

arrow