A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 13, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of a fine of one million won or more due to a violation of road traffic law in the support of the Daejeon District Court Seosan on April 13, 2007, and on February 3, 2009, the same court received a summary order of a fine of two million won or more due to a violation of road traffic law.

Criminal facts

1. On September 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven a three-distance motor vehicle, which was under influence of alcohol leveling 0.325% of alcohol level in the section of approximately 1km from the front of a three-distance stop located in the field of YG, Seosan-si, Seosan-si, Seosan-si, to the front of the same Myeonnsan-ri, Seosan-ri, the Defendant driven a B Twork XG passenger vehicle with approximately 0.325% alcohol level.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (in the event of an accident) was driving the said van while under the influence of alcohol at the same time, at a place, as described in paragraph 1, and was proceeding from Daejeon to Daejeon.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall accurately operate the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the motor vehicle, shall not drive the motor vehicle at a speed or in a manner that impedes and impedes others according to the traffic conditions of the road and the structure and performance of the motor vehicle, and has a duty of care to properly report the right and the right and the right of the road and prevent the accident from occurring.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant did not take any measures, such as the Defendant’s negligence while neglecting it and neglecting it, and instead left the site without checking the matter of damage at the site, such as where the repair cost was 40,000 won, such as where the 40,000 won was destroyed to the point of the right edge of the Defendant’s driving, and where the Defendant did not confirm the matter of damage at the site, even though he did not take any measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C.