logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.04.13 2017고단1292
특수폭행등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Special assault Defendant is the victim C (V, 42 years of age) and the husband and wife.

On February 17, 2017, at around 23:15, the defendant was in the house of the victim who is operating the D apartment of Gyeyang-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and was in the house to dispute with the victim about divorce and divorce, and the victim's remaining dynamics are in the house, and the victim's remaining dynamics were in the house, and there was no end of the width.

“In other words, the victim was suffering from brupted beds of wooden material (one meter wide, 60cm long) which is a dangerous object before the victim's birth, and became the victim.

In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

2. On February 17, 2017, at around 23:20 on February 17, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of special official duties: (a) took the entrance door to enter the entrance, which is a dangerous object (10 cm in length, 21 cm in total) with the heatr’s own air conditioners, and at the entrance of the entrance, the Defendant: (b) took the entrance of the entrance in order to bring the assault at the victim’s house as above at around 23:20 on February 17, 201, and reported that the assault case occurred; and (c) was called out by the police.

"Absing the desire to make excessive excessive, booming the F with the desire to take a bath to G, posing a threat to the excessive road, and assaulting police officers such as F and G to put the defective arms in order for them to take excessive strings, to put them off, to put them over F, and to walk up on the bridge.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention and suppression of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and C;

1. Each written statement C, H and I;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. On-site photographs and standing photographs;

1. Existing presence under subparagraph 1 of this Article;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Articles 261, 260(1) (a) and 144(1) and 136(1) of the Criminal Act for criminal facts (a point of obstructing the performance of special official duties) of the relevant Act;

1.Article 40 of the Criminal Code of Trade and Trade.

arrow