1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts (based on recognition: The non-contentious facts, the entries in Gap evidence 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8; the result of physical entrustment to the Jeonnam University Hospital in this Court; the result of the request for the examination of medical records to the Association of this Court; the purport of the whole pleadings);

A. On November 3, 2007, the Plaintiff was diagnosed of brain damage, etc. on the part of a traffic accident. From March 201, the Plaintiff was registered as a class 4 disabled person with a brain disease on February 10, 2013.

B. From January 3, 2014 to February 7, 2014, the Plaintiff hospitalized in E Hospital and received brain-related rehabilitation treatment, and was hospitalized in F Hospital operated by the Defendant on March 13, 2014 (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

The defendant hospital has a three-stage nursing system (non-liver, basic nursing, and total nursing) compared to the patient's condition, and the plaintiff was provided with health care services, such as hygiene management, urine treatment, meal assistance, and other daily assistance, as the plaintiff suffered difficulties in walking at the right side.

C. However, on March 14, 2014 following the date of hospitalization, the Plaintiff suffered from 06:50 bed from the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed of the bed, the

(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.

Since August 2014, the Plaintiff’s symptoms have gradually deteriorated after the instant accident, the Plaintiff is unable to communicate with each other and perform daily activities due to the low awareness of anti-competence from August 2014.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Defendant asserted that the instant accident occurred in violation of the duty of care to observe the patient’s actions in a deep sense with stable medical facilities and prevent the occurrence of the instant accident, even though the medical personnel under his/her jurisdiction should be carefully observe the patient’s actions, and as a result, all measures for treatment were delayed even after the accident, and the Plaintiff was in an

Therefore, the defendant is liable to the plaintiff for damages under Article 750 of the Civil Act.