Cases
2018Du58516 Revocation of a corrective order
Plaintiff Appellant
A Company A
Law Firm Sejong, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant
[Defendant-Appellee] Attorneys Song Jae-chul et al.
Defendant Appellee
Fair Trade Commission
Law Firm branch line, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant
Attorney Gangnam-gu, Lee Jin-ok, Lee Jin-young
The judgment below
Seoul High Court Decision 2017Nu74025 Decided September 13, 2018
Imposition of Judgment
January 17, 2019
Text
The appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.
Reasons
All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by
January 17, 2019
Judges
Justices Kwon Soon-il
Justices Lee Ki-taik
Justices Park Jung-hwa
Justices Kim Jong-soo