logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.1.25. 선고 2017노3916 판결
도로교통법위반(음주운전), 도로교통법위반(무면허운전)
Cases

2017No3916 Violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-license)

(Operation)

Defendant

A

Appellant

Defendant

Prosecutor

Park No-san (Public Prosecution) and a trial in the jurisdiction thereof.

The judgment below

Seoul Central District Court Decision 2017 Height5894 Decided October 18, 2017

Imposition of Judgment

January 25, 2018

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

The punishment sentenced by the court below (two years of suspended execution in six months of imprisonment, two years of community service order, 120 hours of community service) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

The Defendant committed the instant crime even if he/she had the record of being punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million on May 27, 2013, a fine of KRW 4 million on March 22, 2016, and a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). However, the Defendant committed the instant crime on October 10, 2016, and the blood alcohol concentration of KRW 0.140% is considerably high, which are disadvantageous to the Defendant.

However, the fact that the defendant is recognized as committing the crime of this case and is against the law, and that there is no record of punishment more than three times of suspension of the execution of the fine, etc. are favorable to the defendant.

In addition, considering the following circumstances, there is no change in special circumstances to change the sentence of the court below after the sentence of the court below, and the defendant's age, environment, character and conduct, motive of crime, and circumstances before and after the crime was committed, the sentence of the court below cannot be deemed to be unfair because the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is not acceptable.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges

The presiding judge, senior judge and senior judge

Judges Park Jong-ho

Judges Lee Jae-in

arrow